[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?
- Subject: RE: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?
- From: "Heyer, Matthew A." <mheyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:25:58 -0500
If I recall correctly, the ST's were fitted with Bridgestone BT56's, and
the RS's Bridgestone BT020's.
Matt Heyer
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
simonb
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 6:25 AM
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and
ST?
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 08:52 +0000, Gavin Lawrie wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the info - I guess from what you say that the
> differences I experienced were probably mostly due to the ride height
> / steering angle, plus perhaps a bit due to less weight (the loan RS
> did not have a center stand, and I guess the ST fairing must weigh a
> bit too). The 'narrower feel' sounds like it is due to plus narrower
> clip-ons. All small changes, but net effect is quite significant. I
> still prefer my ST - but should I ever become rich I get the feeling
> that an RS in the garage for blasting about country roads on the
> weekend could be a good thing... :)
It would be interesting to know what tyres where fitted to both bikes.
For me this makes one of the biggest differences in how a bike handles.
- --
simonb <simonb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=