[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Registry columns
- Subject: RE: Registry columns
- From: Paul Master <master@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 09:57:03 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF0B64.D1D2AE86
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree that the Owner Registry might not be the best place for this. I
would recommend that a separate "Problem" registry might be a better =
way to
go. It might be as simple as a Problem Column, a Solution Problem, a =
Covered
Under Warranty Column, and a Count Column (not quite sure how you would
implement this, perhaps a count of a separate list of registry numbers =
- -
these could be looked up in the registry to find out name, model year, =
VIN #
etc. One minor point, it seems that updating the registry deletes you
previous entry and replaces it with the next available number, this =
might be
problematic in the above scheme). This would keep it fairly simple,
certainly would indicate any trends, and also be very useful as =
feedback to
Triumph. My tuppence.
- -----Original Message-----
From: Eric Sheley [mailto:eric@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 7:10 AM
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Registry columns
"Leatherbiker" wrote:
>it might actually be a good idea to add a column to the registry =E0 =
la
>"previous experience of RTA and/or handling insurance claims"
Martin Fay wrote:
> Actually, I was thinking that sections for modifications and =
Problems
> experienced might be useful. Particularly for determining the
> frequency of problems and sharing thoughts on the efficacy of
> aftermarket goodies or innovations (Lances fender chop / Jacks =
lock
> protector etc...).
Well, the next thing I was thinking about adding was the "Accessories=20
Added" section. Are you recommending that we rate the relative=20
efficaciousness of each accessory ?
On the "Problem" column, I have not made up my mind. It has its good=20
points, but can also have many negative effects. Don't look for it in =
the=20
near future ;-)
Anyone else have thoughts on this ?
- - Eric
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * =
*
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF0B64.D1D2AE86
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: Registry columns</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I agree that the Owner Registry might not be the best =
place for this. I would recommend that a separate "Problem" =
registry might be a better way to go. It might be as simple as a =
Problem Column, a Solution Problem, a Covered Under Warranty Column, =
and a Count Column (not quite sure how you would implement this, =
perhaps a count of a separate list of registry numbers - these could be =
looked up in the registry to find out name, model year, VIN # etc. One =
minor point, it seems that updating the registry deletes you previous =
entry and replaces it with the next available number, this might be =
problematic in the above scheme). This would keep it fairly simple, =
certainly would indicate any trends, and also be very useful as =
feedback to Triumph. My tuppence.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Eric Sheley [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:eric@xxxxxxxxxx">mailto:eric@xxxxxxxxxx</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 7:10 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: Re: Registry columns</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>"Leatherbiker" wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> >it might actually be a good idea to add a =
column to the registry =E0 la</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> >"previous experience of RTA and/or =
handling insurance claims"</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Martin Fay wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> > Actually, I was =
thinking that sections for modifications and Problems</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> > experienced might =
be useful. Particularly for determining the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> > frequency of =
problems and sharing thoughts on the efficacy of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> > aftermarket =
goodies or innovations (Lances fender chop / Jacks lock</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> > protector =
etc...).</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Well, the next thing I was thinking about adding was =
the "Accessories </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Added" section. Are you recommending that we =
rate the relative </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>efficaciousness of each accessory ?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>On the "Problem" column, I have not made up =
my mind. It has its good </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>points, but can also have many negative effects. =
Don't look for it in the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>near future ;-)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Anyone else have thoughts on this ?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>- Eric</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> * * * =
* * * * * =
* * * * * =
* * * * * =
*</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the =
Unofficial ST Website</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> <A =
HREF=3D"http://www.TriumphNet.com/st" =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.TriumphNet.com/st</A> for ST and Mailing =
List info</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF0B64.D1D2AE86--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=