[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] for Matt - failure to communicate
- Subject: Re: [ST] for Matt - failure to communicate
- From: <dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:17:03 +0000
Don,
LMAO
You should save all your replies and release them in book
form.
Dave Bardell
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:53:00 -0700
donnydogood <donalddraper@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Your analogy is tragically flawed... <<<
>
> You're correct of course,... but the flaw is that I
>failed to
>qualify the type of damage to which I was referring,
>namely /frame/
>/damage/ only. Without that specification the difference
>between
>straight and glancing blows loses it's validity. It was
>an early
>warning sign of senility, like forgetting to zip down.
> =8o(
>
> dowgydoodoo - -
>- o&\o
>
>_______________________________________________
>Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
>Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com