[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] MCN 05 ST Review
- Subject: Re: [ST] MCN 05 ST Review
- From: simonb@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:44:44 +0100
Quoting iPat <pmdavies@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Ride magazine had a readers poll and it came number one
> its subjective. Reviewers will always be prejudiced and some of these
> magazines depend on their advertising.......
>
> On 9/13/05, dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Really came out bad for Triumph. Sounds like they got a bike that was not
> prepped at all or was thrashed by other mags first. I usually put a lot of
> faith in MCN, but certainly would not by a VFR as a result of this test.
> Wonder if Triumph will provide a properly set up unit or weatehr they
> consider MCN as a mag with little influence. It's one of the few I read
> from cover to cover.
You have to read the editorial in MCN to get a more balanced view of the road
tests.
--
SimonB
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com