[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] RE: Brett - been there
- Subject: RE: [ST] RE: Brett - been there
- From: "Jeremy Witt" <jeremyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:30:06 -0400
Mostly irrelevant, but on the same thread, the Speed Triple is still the shortest stopping bike, ABS or not, (according to MCN) 60-0. Something like 106'. Which could explain the extra-strong brakes on the Sprint.
JDW
<ducking back out after that useless trivia...>
________________________________
From: st-triumphnet.com-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of simonb
Sent: Fri 5/13/2005 7:18 PM
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ST] RE: Brett - been there
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 19:57 +0200, Emile Nossin wrote:
> except for the CBR which gets braking distances equal
> to the ABS bikes wet or dry thanks to the DCBS.
RE: DCBS The only thing I can find on Google is Blackbird or CBR web
sites. No independent test seem to be available. But I can remeber MCN
testing which gave the opposite results. I think one of the testers fell
off the CBR1000 because the front brake comes on with the rear brake.
--
simonb <simonb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com