[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Are we being taken for granted?
- Subject: Re: [ST] Are we being taken for granted?
- From: "Ashley Bennett" <spondon955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:35:49 +1000
Thats ridiculous, sorry but Triumph surely have shown that they don't lack
money. How could they have produced the TT600, Bonneville, Bonneville
America, new Daytona etc without money ? It is possible to buy ANY make of
bike from the previous model year. I read that Triumph sales in the US are
up over 30% when at the same time sales generally are up 16%. I don't know
why they choose not to change the ST but it most certain;y isn't anything to
do with a lack of money.
Ashley
Spondon 955
'95 Speed Triple
> I'm not sure WHY Triumph chooses not to make improvements to their
> bikes. I think it maybe financial it maybe that they cannot afford to
> make improvements since they aren't selling enough and haven't
> recouped the initial investment.. but what really gets me is that the
> real improvements the bike(s) needs could be done for almost zero
> expense on Triumphs part. If you ask Triumph they say we sell all
> that we make.. but that's a bit misleading when you have dealers who
> have new 2000 models and sometimes even 99's still sitting unsold..
> And that may be a big reason for Triumph not making real upgrades
> imagine how hard a sell it would be to move a 2000, 0r 2001 if the
> 2002 had not just a few more ponies but improved suspension,
> adjustable seat, and maybe other goodies.
>
> Erik
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=