RE: Rear brakes, front rotors

["Rick Damiani" <rickd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Jonathan West
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2000 7:27 AM
> To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Rear brakes, front rotors
>
>
> Blake,
> You're right about the wooden feel of the rear brake.  It doesn't do
> much, but it was designed that way.  You think its bad on
> your ST, try a
> 509 or 595- Triumph could have left if off and saved a few pounds.
>
> Rick,
> What's up with your rotors?  Minimum thickness exceeded?
> Warped?  If
> they are warped, why aren't you getting them warrantied?
> Triumph has
> been good about it in the past.  Nobody should be replacing rotors
> yearly.  That's crazy.  Something aint right.

Below the minimum thickness on the left, right at the limit on the
right. I had been using non-stock pads the last 20,000 miles, so that
may have had something to do with it.



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=