[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Aftermarket Can
- Subject: Re: Aftermarket Can
- From: Eric Sheley <Eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 16:23:16 -0500
At 11:27 AM 12/30/00 -0800, lowedaph@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Eric, are you sure about this?
>My understanding was the burden of proof was on the owner, not Triumph.
>ie. if you installed Carillo rods, and there was subsequent engine
>failure, you'd have to prove that the rods weren't contributory in order
>to get it covered under warranty. So, if the system that the aftermarket
>part is in, is related in any way to the failed system, you'd lose.
Well, the original question was in reference to aftermarket cans. I will
amend my statement to say "external aftermarket parts".
I would agree that if you perform any internal engine upgrade, you would
have the burden of proof on your side, and I would guess you would probably
loose if it came to a claim.
Thanks for catching that
- -Eric
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=