[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ST Article
Previously, you (Eric Sheley) wrote:
> I didn't get the "not great" feeling at all - more that he couldn't find
> anything about the bike to be passionate about (using his words).
That's exactly what I meant by "OK but not great". Perhaps if I'd said
"OK but not outstanding" it would have been clearer.
> He wasn't
> able to show me any significant problems with the bike and even goes on to
> say that it can scarcely be faulted. I got the feeling that he just felt it
> was too much a copy versus something that revolutionary in the sport tourer
> category.
Evolution of a concept, not revolution.
> But in my normal "try to show both sides" style I want to put all the info
> out there - good or bad....
And that is good.
> and BTW - I have not found any trouble being passionate about the bike ;-)
I don't think I'll have any problem that way either. :-)
- --
Bill
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=