[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: VFR vs. Sprint (again)
- Subject: Re: VFR vs. Sprint (again)
- From: James Gillespie <jim.gillespie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 18:15:12 +0100 (BST)
>>>>> David J Hughes <bambi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> If you like the sound of high reving 4's then this is a good thing.
I do. But a VFR with a race can is a whole different kettle of
fish. VROOM! Riding in the Alps last year I was having fun in
tunnels on my Super III with, ahem, tasteful cans; then I heard a VFR
with a full race system coming the other way :-)
> I'm happier with the lower rev note of the trumpy.
Still waiting for the naughty exhaust...
Jim
- --
jim@ ,'_ if you think that angle grinders are
ixion.org.uk / -.--. ___ the funnest tool [...] you obviously
+44 171 721 2672 _\_x ~-.`--'_.-' had a childhood sadly deprived of
/ /\\ \--'_ \\ oxy-acetylene cutting gear.
'99 Sprint ST \__/ `---' \__/ -- Andy the Pugh
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=